One Marines take on the election

By Troy = Okinawa Japan

I didn’t realize how absolutely ignorant and closed-minded liberals were until today. The utter amount of ignorance, immaturity, and disbelief I have seen all over the internet since Trumps victory has been astounding. Him being elected is not going to change your day to day life whatsoever. He is not going to personally find you and ruin your life like y’all are making it seem he will. You will literally only notice an extra few bucks on your pay checks from taxes lowering and that you may be able to find yourself cheaper health care. It doesn’t matter if you’re Mexican, Muslim, gay, black, white, female or male. As long as you are a law abiding citizen and do not engage yourself an illegal activities you will literally not have a single thing to worry about.

If you are here illegally, then you have no right to complain about the president, and no right to be upset if you get deported, you’re here illegally! That’s you’re own fault. It’s astounding how illegals believe they deserve anything from this country and have even the slightest urged to try and protest this election and our future president as well. It has been such a large surprise to see how close minded those I used to associate with are and how truly ignorant they really are. I have to stop myself from almost feeling bad for them as they try to paint themselves as victims in this situation. Seeing people pretend to be scared for their life because of the election results is absolutely ridiculous as well. There’s still law in the land, the only fear you need have is the law if you do something you’re not supposed to.

Quit dramatizing a situation in which you didn’t get your way or choice such as Hillary in office. If you want to ensure the best life you can have then continue being productive members of society, shut up about the election, and unite the country. Complaining on Facebook and creating over dramatic reactions is only going to put a greater divide in a very large and powerful country and will do nothing for Americans moving forward. The only way this country will realistically improve is when we are together as one county undivided.

The ignorance of the left wing nut heads has grown to an unacceptable point. There are people inciting riots across the country as they speak because they didn’t get their way in this election and are currently yelling F*** Donald Trump over and over. How does that make them any better than the supposed Trump the media has portrayed this entire election, which now has been proven to be entirely corrupt and biased to the left wing liberals. The inaccuracy of the medias reporting of this election season has been entirely disgusting as well. For an outlet for information which is supposed to remain unbiased and true it sure did not do the American people justice this year. It is absolutely sickening the amount of power and persuasion that they have ahold of in today’s society.

I’m sorry but the amount of bullsh*t I’ve seen on my feed today gave me such an uncontrollable need to type out what I was thinking. I could go on and on about the hypocrisy of the left now that this election is over and go through facts and prove everything to a deeper point but that’d fall upon deaf ears and ultimately be a waste of time. I can only hope people open their eyes and work together towards a move progressive and united future. How about you actually listen to Trump speak, actually hear what he has to say about America moving forward and assist in improving this country for all who live in it. Ignore it if you’d like, or try to fight it, but this is the America you live in. ✌🏼

constitution_quill_pen

We the People

The tree of liberty must be refreshed…

Hillary Clinton will not be our next President.

clinton-huma

First came the email scandal where Hillary personally decided to use here own homebrewed server to run clintonmail.com . This allowed her to hide her emails as secretary of state from being recorded as government communications and for making her accountable for her actions. She allowed our governments secrets to be taken out of their “secure” email system and either be printed or sent to her aids who then would “declassify them by removing markings and transfer them to google, Yahoo or Clinton mail. This in and of itself was a crime as knowingly removing 1 secret document is grounds for conviction and prison as many of our military members know.
Once discovered John Podesta, Cheryl Mills and others conspired to “dump them” in order to not to produce them under subpoena. They went to great lengths to delete up to 32,000 emails that Hillary said only covered Yoga and family. They went as far as to use “BleachBit” to erase the hard drives and hammers to destroy the devices. Hillary repeatedly lied repeatedly that she only wanted to use 1 device for convenience instead of a “Secure” communication device. It turns out she had more than 13 devices. More lies. And just before James Comey told us how guilty Hillary was in the email scandal, Bill swooped into Phoenix AZ. on a 120 degree day to “bump into Loretta Lynch in her private jet. They met for over half an hour discussing “family”. Well I am sure the only family Bill discussed was his wife and how he could keep her out of jail. The next day Hillary had her “FBI meeting” where immunity was handed out and Hillary conveniently “Forgot” most of the answers to the questions asked.

Then I sat and watched James Comey beautifully lay out a case against Hillary on how she misled the government. How she illegally took secret items out of their secure areas. Ignored marking on classified documents that she said she never had. It was a complete description of a person going to trial and then jail. Then he said “but” and let her off the hook. That was when America knew something was rotten in Denmark.

Then it was learned that through the Clinton Foundation Bill and Hillary had become multi millionaires in short order by running a charity. Hillary and Bill would collect from $300,000 up to several millions for meeting with and talking to people. This is now been exposed as a potentially criminal “Pay to Play” organization that included selling off over 10% of Americas Uranium reserves to Russia that Hillary’s State dept had to approve.

The Clinton’s collected Millions of dollars from foreign countries that have not always been friendly to the United States including many that were involved in executing the 9/11 attacks and with terrible human rights records which include the killing of homosexuals and women who are treated as property. The Clinton’s also made millions for them and their friends in smuggling weapons to the middle east eventually making their way to ISIS to be used against Americans, Iraqis and other nations. I could go on for pages covering the unethical and illegal acts the Clinton’s and their Cabal committed.

Now most of you have been following the Wikileaks that have been going on against the Democrats. It started first with the DNC and led to the firing of Debbie Wasserman – Schultz and now Donna Brazil who lied about fixing the election for Hillary Clinton.

Then they went after John Podesta Hillary Clinton’s director and long time Clinton General who runs her organization.His leaked emails have exposed the underbelly of the Clinton organization. Out of ignorance the Democrats blamed the Russians of hacking the DNC, Podesta and the other systems. They also stupidly tried to say that the Russians were working with Donald Trump. This was not true.

Wikileaks has also exposed the Justice department for unethical behavior including the bribery of a senior FBI agent by another Clintonista Terry Mcauliff the governor of Virginia. He funded the agents wife (Jill McAbe) by donating over $500,000 to her Senate campaign even though she had no political background. First it turned out that Clinton raised over a million dollars for the PAC that funded the donation. If not a bribe it was quite a conflict as Agent McBabe was working on the Clinton foundation case and told low level agents to “Stand Down” If not a crime it is a clear conflict of interest.

Then we come to the “Weiner factor” Andrew Weiner and his wife (now separated) Huma who is Clinton’s closest aid became the focus of the investigation that has now been reopened.

Tonight a video was posted that brings it all together. A organization of “Honest” United States Intelligence officers appear to be taking credit for providing Wikileaks with all their data and hacked emails. My guess is that they had all this info at their fingertips but were blocked from using it by the Clinton’s and Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

In it it is stated that we cannot afford this criminality to continue and America cannot afford to have Hillary as President. Evidently over the next few days they say evidence will be presented that will prove the criminality of not just the Clinton’s, but all those associate in their criminal activities up to and including the President.

Am I skeptical? Yes. But we need to see what happens next.If my suspicions are true and my Pirate senses are correct the criminals in D.C. better watch out. The good guys are back and it is going to get ugly.

This Thomas Jefferson quote came to mind just now:

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. Thomas Jefferson

The time is now, please watch the video below.

Stand up for what is right.

 

 

Forget emails, FBI now may have Clinton Abedin Text messages

10/31/2016

If recent news is correct and the 650,000 emails on Anthony Weiners computer is an ongoing backup of wife Huma’s phone then there may be gold in them there hills.

According to Anthony Weiner the 650,000 emails on his computer came from backups of Humas phone there may be more evidence there in addition to the emails.

Unless they are deleted or told not to backup all text messages are backed up. Think about it. IF Hillary used text as most of us do, we may be sitting on a treasure trove of TEXT messages from and to Hillary Clinton and her top advisers.

The Piratearian

Must attribute if resent or retweeted

hillary-clinton-email-un-20150310

Copywrite 10/31/2016

 

Hillaries Smoking GUN Proof of BRIBES

Here is EVIDENCE that Hillary and her staff solicited donations in a PAY for PLAY scheme. HUMA was actively involved in solicitations for HILLARY while at State working for Clinton and solicited MILLIONS for the CLINTON FOUNDATION!

Re: FYI CGI Africa

Why Republican establishment is against Trump (not what you think)

What if…

2009 Obama and Clinton are plotting their “Arab Spring” .
Along with destabilizing Libya, Yemen and Egypt they come up with a “Syria solution”
They decide to arm the anti Assad rebels to push Assad to resign.

Clinton takes this to Capitol Hill and gets buyin from senior Republicans and Democrats..

The State Dept and CIA set up shop in Benghazi after they destabilize and KILL Qaddafi.

The US then spends BILLIONS buying up weapons including MANPADS from Libya and start shipping them to Syrian rebels through an intermediary possibly Turkey.

But Syria goes sideways. The “REBELS” thatClinton chose go rogue. They become the genesis for ISIS or ISIL.
The Embassy in Benghazi falls and our Ambassador who was managing the arms deal for Clinton is killed. The State dept / CIA annex is destroyed.

New York Senator Hillary Clinton (L) lis

Now not only are Obama and Clinton implicated, so are top Republicans such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham. Everyone who approved of arming and creating ISIS is at risk.

Enter Donald Trump.
A Republican outsider who does not play by the rules. He rides a wave of revolution in the US.
Obama, Clinton and top Republicans know that their “secret” could be exposed.

Now they are panicking. If this is exposed they all could go to jail and risk their cozy jobs and pensions. (Remember Iran Contra)

So they all turn on Donald Trump, but they are also scared as they see the people from both parties revolting. They know that Trump would investigate and expose their treasonous activities. Trump does have a chance to win the election…

All because Clinton decided she wanted to change the Middle East…

What America wants in a President

Donald Trump very well may be the next President of the United States.
trump12

A perfect storm has gathered to make this happen.
It was inevitable.

I have a theory.

Ever since Bill Clinton came into the White House with the rise of the information age
the political spectrum has become much more extreme. With the rise of the internet websites and media companies like drudgereport.com, Breitbart and Fox news allowed the conservative message (extreme right wing) to grow and be heard without censorship by the mainstream media.

Because of this companies like MSNBC  and the New York Times among others moved farther to the liberal side preaching to the extreme left. The democrats even disguised companies like media matters to preach their liberal views.

Our politics became polarized,  you were either labeled a crazy right wing conservative or an ultra liberal. Families started to fight and the liberals demonized all thing conservative convinced that they were the mainstream.
Being a conservative I was called crazy by my liberal family in San Francisco. I in turned left town to a much more conservative place (Arizona).

But the more I supported the GOP, the more I learned that they did not care about MY views. The candidates I supported lied to me. They made promises yet caved when it came time for execution. To them I was just a source of income. This became clear when I met John McCain. I had written him letters yet never got a real response from him. I expressed my view on policies that were important to me like Immigration, Veterans issues, Taxes and Government Waste. Yet when I met him in person all he would mutter was “elections have consequences, elections have consequences”. I realized that my votes for him and the GOP had been wasted. I leaned more to the tea party whose message closer matched my views. (I am not going to vote for McCain any longer)

As time went on I became more of a Libertarian. I realized that I was not an ultra conservative, yet NOT a liberal. My views fell somewhere in between. I want smaller government, but I also want more personal freedom. I am pro life, but I agree that the law is settled and who am I to tell a woman what she can and cannot do. If someone wants to smoke weed go for it no harm, no foul. Just do note toke and drive.

I am pro military (My son is an active duty Marine). However I do not think we need to be the worlds policeman. BUT if genocide is going on we do have a responsibility to help stop it.
I also think we need to help the poor and create a welfare safety net, BUT it must be tied to job training for those who are able and not encourage lazy behavior.

But I realized I was not being represented. It appeared that I needed to choose far right or far left. I got angry and frustrated.

I felt that we needed someone in the middle, not a Liberal Democrat or a Conservative Republican.

Then here came the current election cycle and Donald Trump.
I realize that Donald Trump is not perfect. But he is the ANTI Politician option.
I love the fact that he does not cave into special interests as he does not take their money.
But he tells it like it is and is expressing the frustration of much of America.

He is not a total conservative, yet not a liberal but that is O.K.

The voters are tired of the status quo. Tired of being told what to do by a lying establishment who does not represent them.

I hope Trump is elected and disrupts or destroys the Republican party as we know it. Create a party more in tune with the people.

I think Trump will build a Mexico wall. I think he will stop the flow of illegal aliens from Mexico, South America AND the Middle East. I think he will support the military and also restructure the US Government to eliminate waste. I trust he will also bring in experts to fill positions in his administration.  I also think he will restore the United States economy again to position it as the greatest place to do business.
High hopes I know.

But I am sure of a few things.

If the GOP ignores the voters to put in their own puppet (Romney of Rubio) they will see a revolt like no other and will be made irrelevant.

If we head into socialism or are continuously ignored or change does not happen there will be a revolution and breakdown of society.

So if AMERICA elects Trump as President, I hope he is a positive agent of change and helps getting America back on track, it may be a good thing.

 

Ahoy

 

 

 

 

 

Why America is in love with Donald Trump

As of today Donald Trump is still surging in the polls. This is aggravating to many people.

  • The Mainstream Media
  • The Democratic Party
  • The Republican Pary
  • The Obama Administration

I was never a Donald Trump fan. Yes I watched “The Apprentice” for entertainment, but that was it.

Then he gave his speech in 2015 on illegal immigration. I live in Arizona so I hear first hand of the criminals crossing the border smuggling drugs, guns and people. I have seen home invasions by illegals and reports of how the drug runners have penetrated 100’s of miles north to establish smuggling routes going so far as to place sentries on mountain peaks to track police and sheriff patrols.

Daily there are reports of crimes committed by illegals and of 100’s in not 1000’s crossing the border illegally daily. I have driven through the Yuma sector of the border that is an armed camp with Border Patrol agents, lights and sensors trying to cover every inch of the border fence. I have seen our schools struggling to keep up with the non english speaking children dumped into public schools slowing down the learning progress of the children of legal citizens.

So I went to his rally and you know what? I was impressed.

First I stood in line with 1000’s of normal Americans. Not radicals, not maniacs, not crazies. Normal Americans from every walk of life, of every color. We all wanted to hear what Donald would say. He did not disappoint.

He started out talking about illegal immigration and the cost to the nation. He spoke of American exceptional-ism, the greatness we were known for.

He actually pointed his finger at the media covering the event and told them to their face “You lie to the American public”
You will take my words and twist them and take me out of context.

Then he said he would rebuild the American military back to being the strongest fighting force in the world. So strong, nobody would risk crossing us.

What he said was many things many of us knew were true. But he did not have a filter of political correctness.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump finishes up speaking before a crowd of 3,500 Saturday, July 11, 2015, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump finishes up speaking before a crowd of 3,500 Saturday, July 11, 2015, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Donald Trump has a way of cutting through the political BS and we liked what we heard.

This nation is under assault. We are being destroyed right before our eyes.
America is exceptional, we are the leader of the free world, even after President Obama’s attempts to back all our enemies.
We are being crushed by political correctness and the needs of the minority instead of the majority.

America is ready for a leader not a politician. A man or woman who can cut through the B.S., tell the truth and put us back on the right path.

It is to be seen if he can survive, but looking at Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jessie Ventura, Al Franken and my hero Ronald Reagan, I would not be surprised to see the Donald take it all the way in a landslide. It could happen!

If so I will express joy in seeing the Republican establishment squirm and be torn apart.

Maybe then we can restore a Government of the People, by the People and for the People that shall not perish from this earth that Abraham Lincoln spoke of.

The Pirate

unclesam1

Previously Secret report shows Obama and Clinton aided in forming ISIS

The truth is coming out why we were in Benghazi. The question is WHO in the media will report the truth?

Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US “Created” ISIS As A “Tool” To Overthrow Syria’s President Assad

Tyler Durden's picture

From the first sudden, and quite dramatic, appearance of the fanatical Islamic group known as ISIS which was largely unheard of until a year ago, on the world’s stage and which promptly replaced the worn out and tired al Qaeda as the world’s terrorist bogeyman, we suggested that the “straight to beheading YouTube clip” purpose behind the Saudi Arabia-funded Islamic State was a simple one: use the Jihadists as the vehicle of choice to achieve a political goal: depose of Syria’s president Assad, who for years has stood in the way of a critical Qatari natural gas pipeline, one which could dethrone Russia as Europe’s dominant – and belligerent – source of energy, reaching an interim climax with the unsuccessful Mediterranean Sea military build up of 2013, which nearly resulted in quasi-world war.

The narrative and the plotline were so transparent, even Russia saw right through them. Recall from September of last year:

If the West bombs Islamic State militants in Syria without consulting Damascus, LiveLeak reports that the anti-ISIS alliance may use the occasion to launch airstrikes against President Bashar Assad’s forces, according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Clearly comprehending that Obama’s new strategy against ISIS in Syria is all about pushing the Qatar pipeline through (as was the impetus behind the 2013 intervention push), Russia is pushing back noting that the it is using ISIS as a pretext for bombing Syrian government forces and warning that “such a development would lead to a huge escalation of conflict in the Middle East and North Africa.”

But it’s one thing to speculate; it’s something entirely different to have hard proof.

And while speculation was rife that just like the CIA-funded al Qaeda had been used as a facade by the US to achieve its own geopolitical and national interests over the past two decades, so ISIS was nothing more than al Qaeda 2.0, there was no actual evidence of just this.

That may all have changed now when a declassified secret US government document obtained by the public interest law firm, Judicial Watch, shows that Western governments deliberately allied with al-Qaeda and other Islamist extremist groups to topple Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad.

According to investigative reporter Nafeez Ahmed in Medium, the “leaked document reveals that in coordination with the Gulf states and Turkey, the West intentionally sponsored violent Islamist groups to destabilize Assad, despite anticipating that doing so could lead to the emergence of an ‘Islamic State’ in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

According to the newly declassified US document, the Pentagon foresaw the likely rise of the ‘Islamic State’ as a direct consequence of the strategy, but described this outcome as a strategic opportunity to “isolate the Syrian regime.” 

And not just that: as we reported last week, now that ISIS is running around the middle east, cutting people’s heads of in 1080p quality and Hollywood-quality (perhaps literally) video, the US has a credible justification to sell billions worth of modern, sophisticated weapons in the region in order to “modernize” and “replenish” the weapons of such US allies as Saudi Arabia, Israel and Iraq.

But that the US military-industrial complex is a winner every time war breaks out anywhere in the world (usually with the assistance of the CIA) is clear to everyone by now. What wasn’t clear is just how the US predetermined the current course of events in the middle east.

Now, thanks to the following declassified report, we have a far better understanding of not only how current events in the middle east came to be, but what America’s puppermaster role leading up to it all, was. 

From Nafeez Ahmed: Secret Pentagon report reveals West saw ISIS as strategic asset Anti-ISIS coalition knowingly sponsored violent extremists to ‘isolate’ Assad, rollback ‘Shia expansion’, originally posted in Medium.

Hypocrisy

 

The revelations contradict the official line of Western government on their policies in Syria, and raise disturbing questions about secret Western support for violent extremists abroad, while using the burgeoning threat of terror to justify excessive mass surveillance and crackdowns on civil liberties at home.

Among the batch of documents obtained by Judicial Watch through a federal lawsuit, released earlier this week, is a US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document then classified as “secret,” dated 12th August 2012.

The DIA provides military intelligence in support of planners, policymakers and operations for the US Department of Defense and intelligence community.

So far, media reporting has focused on the evidence that the Obama administration knew of arms supplies from a Libyan terrorist stronghold to rebels in Syria.

Some outlets have reported the US intelligence community’s internal prediction of the rise of ISIS. Yet none have accurately acknowledged the disturbing details exposing how the West knowingly fostered a sectarian, al-Qaeda-driven rebellion in Syria.

Charles Shoebridge, a former British Army and Metropolitan Police counter-terrorism intelligence officer, said:

“Given the political leanings of the organisation that obtained these documents, it’s unsurprising that the main emphasis given to them thus far has been an attempt to embarrass Hilary Clinton regarding what was known about the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi in 2012. However, the documents also contain far less publicized revelations that raise vitally important questions of the West’s governments and media in their support of Syria’s rebellion.”

The West’s Islamists

The newly declassified DIA document from 2012 confirms that the main component of the anti-Assad rebel forces by this time comprised Islamist insurgents affiliated to groups that would lead to the emergence of ISIS. Despite this, these groups were to continue receiving support from Western militaries and their regional allies.

Noting that “the Salafist [sic], the Muslim Brotherhood, and AQI [al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,” the document states that “the West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition,” while Russia, China and Iran “support the [Assad] regime.”

The 7-page DIA document states that al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), the precursor to the ‘Islamic State in Iraq,’ (ISI) which became the ‘Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,’ “supported the Syrian opposition from the beginning, both ideologically and through the media.”

The formerly secret Pentagon report notes that the “rise of the insurgency in Syria” has increasingly taken a “sectarian direction,” attracting diverse support from Sunni “religious and tribal powers” across the region.

In a section titled ‘The Future Assumptions of the Crisis,’ the DIA report predicts that while Assad’s regime will survive, retaining control over Syrian territory, the crisis will continue to escalate “into proxy war.”

The document also recommends the creation of “safe havens under international sheltering, similar to what transpired in Libya when Benghazi was chosen as the command centre for the temporary government.”

In Libya, anti-Gaddafi rebels, most of whom were al-Qaeda affiliated militias, were protected by NATO ‘safe havens’ (aka ‘no fly zones’).

‘Supporting powers want’ ISIS entity

In a strikingly prescient prediction, the Pentagon document explicitly forecasts the probable declaration of “an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria.”

Nevertheless, “Western countries, the Gulf states and Turkey are supporting these efforts” by Syrian “opposition forces” fighting to “control the eastern areas (Hasaka and Der Zor), adjacent to Western Iraqi provinces (Mosul and Anbar)”:

“… there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).”

The secret Pentagon document thus provides extraordinary confirmation that the US-led coalition currently fighting ISIS, had three years ago welcomed the emergence of an extremist “Salafist Principality” in the region as a way to undermine Assad, and block off the strategic expansion of Iran. Crucially, Iraq is labeled as an integral part of this “Shia expansion.”

The establishment of such a “Salafist Principality” in eastern Syria, the DIA document asserts, is “exactly” what the “supporting powers to the [Syrian] opposition want.” Earlier on, the document repeatedly describes those “supporting powers” as “the West, Gulf countries, and Turkey.”

Further on, the document reveals that Pentagon analysts were acutely aware of the dire risks of this strategy, yet ploughed ahead anyway.

The establishment of such a “Salafist Principality” in eastern Syria, it says, would create “the ideal atmosphere for AQI to return to its old pockets in Mosul and Ramadi.” Last summer, ISIS conquered Mosul in Iraq, and just this month has also taken control of Ramadi.

Such a quasi-state entity will provide:

“… a renewed momentum under the presumption of unifying the jihad among Sunni Iraq and Syria, and the rest of the Sunnis in the Arab world against what it considers one enemy. ISI could also declare an Islamic State through its union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq and the protection of territory.”

The 2012 DIA document is an Intelligence Information Report (IIR), not a “finally evaluated intelligence” assessment, but its contents are vetted before distribution. The report was circulated throughout the US intelligence community, including to the State Department, Central Command, the Department of Homeland Security, the CIA, FBI, among other agencies.

In response to my questions about the strategy, the British government simply denied the Pentagon report’s startling revelations of deliberate Western sponsorship of violent extremists in Syria. A British Foreign Office spokesperson said:

“AQ and ISIL are proscribed terrorist organisations. The UK opposes all forms of terrorism. AQ, ISIL, and their affiliates pose a direct threat to the UK’s national security. We are part of a military and political coalition to defeat ISIL in Iraq and Syria, and are working with international partners to counter the threat from AQ and other terrorist groups in that region. In Syria we have always supported those moderate opposition groups who oppose the tyranny of Assad and the brutality of the extremists.”

The DIA did not respond to request for comment.

Strategic asset for regime-change

Security analyst Shoebridge, however, who has tracked Western support for Islamist terrorists in Syria since the beginning of the war, pointed out that the secret Pentagon intelligence report exposes fatal contradictions at the heart of official pronunciations:

“Throughout the early years of the Syria crisis, the US and UK governments, and almost universally the West’s mainstream media, promoted Syria’s rebels as moderate, liberal, secular, democratic, and therefore deserving of the West’s support. Given that these documents wholly undermine this assessment, it’s significant that the West’s media has now, despite their immense significance, almost entirely ignored them.”

According to Brad Hoff, a former US Marine who served during the early years of the Iraq War and as a 9/11 first responder at the Marine Corps Headquarters in Battalion Quantico from 2000 to 2004, the just released Pentagon report for the first time provides stunning affirmation that:

“US intelligence predicted the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), but instead of clearly delineating the group as an enemy, the report envisions the terror group as a US strategic asset.”

Hoff, who is managing editor of Levant Report — ?an online publication run by Texas-based educators who have direct experience of the Middle East?—?points out that the DIA document “matter-of-factly” states that the rise of such an extremist Salafist political entity in the region offers a “tool for regime change in Syria.”

The DIA intelligence report shows, he said, that the rise of ISIS only became possible in the context of the Syrian insurgency?—?“there is no mention of US troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits.” The report demonstrates that:

“The establishment of a ‘Salafist Principality’ in Eastern Syria is ‘exactly’ what the external powers supporting the opposition want (identified as ‘the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey’) in order to weaken the Assad government.”

The rise of a Salafist quasi-state entity that might expand into Iraq, and fracture that country, was therefore clearly foreseen by US intelligence as likely?—?but nevertheless strategically useful?—?blowback from the West’s commitment to “isolating Syria.”

Complicity

Critics of the US-led strategy in the region have repeatedly raised questions about the role of coalition allies in intentionally providing extensive support to Islamist terrorist groups in the drive to destabilize the Assad regime in Syria.

The conventional wisdom is that the US government did not retain sufficient oversight on the funding to anti-Assad rebel groups, which was supposed to be monitored and vetted to ensure that only ‘moderate’ groups were supported.

However, the newly declassified Pentagon report proves unambiguously that years before ISIS launched its concerted offensive against Iraq, the US intelligence community was fully aware that Islamist militants constituted the core of Syria’s sectarian insurgency.

Despite that, the Pentagon continued to support the Islamist insurgency, even while anticipating the probability that doing so would establish an extremist Salafi stronghold in Syria and Iraq.

As Shoebridge told me, “The documents show that not only did the US government at the latest by August 2012 know the true extremist nature and likely outcome of Syria’s rebellion”?—?namely, the emergence of ISIS?—?“but that this was considered an advantage for US foreign policy. This also suggests a decision to spend years in an effort to deliberately mislead the West’s public, via a compliant media, into believing that Syria’s rebellion was overwhelmingly ‘moderate.’”

Annie Machon, a former MI5 intelligence officer who blew the whistle in the 1990s on MI6 funding of al-Qaeda to assassinate Libya’s former leader Colonel Gaddafi, similarly said of the revelations:

“This is no surprise to me. Within individual countries there are always multiple intelligence agencies with competing agendas.”

She explained that MI6’s Libya operation in 1996, which resulted in the deaths of innocent people, “happened at precisely the time when MI5 was setting up a new section to investigate al-Qaeda.”

This strategy was repeated on a grand scale in the 2011 NATO intervention in Libya, said Machon, where the CIA and MI6 were:

“… supporting the very same Libyan groups, resulting in a failed state, mass murder, displacement and anarchy. So the idea that elements of the American military-security complex have enabled the development of ISIS after their failed attempt to get NATO to once again ‘intervene’ is part of an established pattern. And they remain indifferent to the sheer scale of human suffering that is unleashed as a result of such game-playing.”

Divide and rule

Several US government officials have conceded that their closest allies in the anti-ISIS coalition were funding violent extremist Islamist groups that became integral to ISIS.

US Vice President Joe Biden, for instance, admitted last year that Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and Turkey had funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Islamist rebels in Syria that metamorphosed into ISIS.

But he did not admit what this internal Pentagon document demonstrates?—?that the entire covert strategy was sanctioned and supervised by the US, Britain, France, Israel and other Western powers.

The strategy appears to fit a policy scenario identified by a recent US Army-commissioned RAND Corp report.

The report, published four years before the DIA document, called for the US “to capitalise on the Shia-Sunni conflict by taking the side of the conservative Sunni regimes in a decisive fashion and working with them against all Shiite empowerment movements in the Muslim world.”

The US would need to contain “Iranian power and influence” in the Gulf by “shoring up the traditional Sunni regimes in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan.” Simultaneously, the US must maintain “a strong strategic relationship with the Iraqi Shiite government” despite its Iran alliance.

The RAND report confirmed that the “divide and rule” strategy was already being deployed “to create divisions in the jihadist camp. Today in Iraq such a strategy is being used at the tactical level.”

The report observed that the US was forming “temporary alliances” with al-Qaeda affiliated “nationalist insurgent groups” that have fought the US for four years in the form of “weapons and cash.” Although these nationalists “have cooperated with al-Qaeda against US forces,” they are now being supported to exploit “the common threat that al-Qaeda now poses to both parties.”

The 2012 DIA document, however, further shows that while sponsoring purportedly former al-Qaeda insurgents in Iraq to counter al-Qaeda, Western governments were simultaneously arming al-Qaeda insurgents in Syria.

The revelation from an internal US intelligence document that the very US-led coalition supposedly fighting ‘Islamic State’ today, knowingly created ISIS in the first place, raises troubling questions about recent government efforts to justify the expansion of state anti-terror powers.

In the wake of the rise of ISIS, intrusive new measures to combat extremism including mass surveillance, the Orwellian ‘prevent duty’ and even plans to enable government censorship of broadcasters, are being pursued on both sides of the Atlantic, much of which disproportionately targets activists, journalists and ethnic minorities, especially Muslims.

Yet the new Pentagon report reveals that, contrary to Western government claims, the primary cause of the threat comes from their own deeply misguided policies of secretly sponsoring Islamist terrorism for dubious geopolitical purposes.


Dr Nafeez Ahmed is an investigative journalist, bestselling author and international security scholar. A former Guardian writer, he writes the ‘System Shift’ column for VICE’s Motherboard, and is also a columnist for Middle East Eye. He is the winner of a 2015 Project Censored Award, known as the ‘Alternative Pulitzer Prize’, for Outstanding Investigative Journalism for his Guardian work, and was selected in the Evening Standard’s ‘Power 1,000’ most globally influential Londoners.

Nafeez has also written for The Independent, Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Scotsman, Foreign Policy, The Atlantic, Quartz, Prospect, New Statesman, Le Monde diplomatique, New Internationalist, Counterpunch, Truthout, among others. He is the author of A User’s Guide to the Crisis of Civilization: And How to Save It (2010), and the scifi thriller novel ZERO POINT, among other books. His work on the root causes and covert operations linked to international terrorism officially contributed to the 9/11 Commission and the 7/7 Coroner’s Inquest.

Why are Republicans pushing secret OBAMA plan without disclosing what is in it?

Obama makes last-ditch plea to Dems ahead of showdown vote on trade

Now PlayingWhite House scrambles to save trade deal

President Obama went to Capitol Hill Friday morning to make a final plea to congressional Democrats for his trade agenda, ahead of a showdown vote in the House.

The president met with House Democratic leaders ahead of a caucus meeting. While it is extremely rare for a president to make a visit like this before a big vote, the last-minute lobbying comes after the president also made a surprise appearance at the annual congressional baseball game between Democrats and Republicans the night before. His personal involvement underscores how fragile the effort is — Fox News is told the effort is still short on the votes — and how important he sees it to his second-term legacy.

The night before, a bizarre scene unfolded as the crowd crammed inside Nationals Park lurched into a chant about the legislation.

“TPA! TPA! TPA!” chanted Republican congressional aides seated near the first base dugout when Obama stepped onto the field at the top of the fourth inning.

This wasn’t quite the drunken, Bronx throng at Yankee Stadium cantillating “Reg-GIE! Reg-GIE! Reg-GIE!” after Reggie Jackson swatted three consecutive home runs in Game Six of the 1977 World Series. This was gamesmanship, Washington-style. A game in which most congressional Republicans find themselves backing the Democratic president’s efforts to pass Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), a framework for a big trade deal the administration hopes to advance later this year.

TPA, which would give the president the ability to “fast-track” future trade deals, is one of two bills due up in the House on Friday. And it’s anybody’s guess if the bills will pass. Members of Congress may have been mixing it up on the diamond. But there is just as much gamesmanship underway on Capitol Hill as lawmakers try to leverage passage or defeat of the trade legislation.

More on this…

  • Stage set for vote to give Obama fast-track trade authority

First, the basics.

Most House Republicans want to approve TPA. But they don’t quite have the votes to do it on their own. They need Democratic support. Yet the irony is that even though Obama is pushing the deal, only about 20-plus House Democrats support their own chief executive on this issue.

So various political gambits kick in.

Republicans find it absurd that Obama can’t persuade more than two-dozen Democratic members to support the trade plan. Conversely, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is stunned that House Republicans, boasting a 246-188 majority, can’t excavate at least 200 GOPers to approve the package.

So Pelosi and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, cut a deal. Neither side promised a certain number of votes to the other. But both House leaders forged a plan which could conceivably reward both sides with a political victory and concurrently test their respective abilities to gin up votes.

Pelosi and Boehner engineered a deal to advance the trade framework to the floor – so long as Democrats scored a vote on something called Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA).

TAA is a program near and dear to the hearts of many Democrats. It’s a method to cushion the blow for various workers and industries damaged by business reallocations in trade agreements. So House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., teed up  two votes for Friday: One for TAA and one on TPA. But a TPA vote was contingent on the House first adopting TAA. The procedural maneuver would require Republicans to carry most of the freight to adopt TPA. But to get there, Democrats would be expected to provide the lion’s share of votes for TAA. If the House doesn’t approve TAA, everything comes to a screeching halt and there’s no vote on TPA.

Further complicating matters, Pelosi has spoken openly against the trade accord but has yet to definitively say how she’ll vote.

Capitol Hill is weird. Weird enough to have Republicans serving as Obama’s TPA cheerleaders – both at the ballpark and in the House chamber. It’s even weirder to have House Democrats working against Obama on this. And then there’s Pelosi – stuck in the middle.

On trade, Pelosi is a switch-pitcher. She’s trying to keep the Democratic caucus from embarrassing Obama with a paltry vote total for TPA. Yet she’s working to make sure most of her caucus gets what it wants: a defeat of TPA. At the same time, Pelosi secured a deal for the TAA vote – which could help pass TPA … or blow it up.

Major League Baseball has a rule for ambidextrous pitchers, few as there may be. Such cross-hurlers must first declare whether they intend to pitch left-handed or right-handed to each batter. There’s no such rule on Capitol Hill. That’s why when it comes to trade, Pelosi is chucking political curveballs from both sides of the mound.

But Democrats are working against Pelosi. A senior House GOP leadership source says Republicans can only provide 50 to 70 votes for TAA. Democrats must make up the difference. However, many Democrats now see a means to an end. Some intend to vote no on TAA simply to detonate the entire process and never get the TPA bill to the floor — which they so despise.

The House nearly voted to truncate the entire process before the first pitch, coming close to voting down a procedural vote just to get the measures to the floor.

Some observers interpreted the uneven procedural vote as a harbinger of things to come Friday on the trade bills. Some lawmakers wondered if Obama – fresh off his dugout diplomatic mission — might ring up lawmakers and implore them to vote aye.

One longtime Democratic member doubted that would happen, noting that Obama had already done all of the calling he could do.

There are games here, too. The same lawmaker signaled that some colleagues might not even take the call if the president phones. In fact, they might even keep their phones switched off.

Judge stands up against Obama amnesty plan!

BREAKING: In A HUGE Blow To The President, Appeals Court Has Just Upheld Block On Amnesty

A sharp rebuke for a president already reeling from one major court defeat…

Print

In a stunning setback to President Obama’s effort to defer deportation and grant certain citizenship rights to millions of illegal immigrants, a federal appeals court has just upheld an injunction blocking Obama’s executive order on amnesty. The Washington Times reports that the highly anticipated ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit marks the second major legal setback for an administration that was skirting the Congress and charging ahead on its highly controversial program to defer deportation for as many as 5 million illegals.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of Texas, which had sued to stop the amnesty, on all key points, finding that Mr. Obama’s amnesty likely broke the law governing how big policies are to be written.

“The public interest favors maintenance of the injunction,” the judges wrote in the majority opinion.

As Western Journalism has reported, U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen in Texas recently refused to lift his order temporarily blocking the president’s unilateral action on amnesty. The angry judge also issued what The Washington Examiner called “a scathing rebuke” to Obama’s lawyers for “misleading” him about steps the administration had already taken to implement the president’s amnesty orders.

Obama’s Justice Department had asked the three-judge Appeals Court to reverse Judge Hanen’s order temporarily blocking the amnesty plan. Hanen’s original order to put the brakes on the president’s executive action was in response to a lawsuit filed by 26 states alleging Obama’s unilateral orders on amnesty were unconstitutional.

A Fox News report on Tuesday’s split-decision Appeals Court defeat for Obama notes: “The states suing to block the plan, led by Texas, argue that Obama acted outside his authority and that the changes would force them to invest more in law enforcement, health care and education. But the White House has said the president acted within his powers to fix a ‘broken immigration system.’”

In Tuesday’s ruling, the two 5th Circuit judges who voted to deny the stay and thus keep the injunction in force said in a written opinion that the federal government’s lawyers are unlikely to succeed on the merits of that appeal.