Has Hillary walked into a FBI trap?

The Piratearian Updated 11/2/2016

This week is about to get very bad for Hillary Clinton.
James Comey has laid a trap and the democrats have walked right into it.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

 

Last Friday James Comey dropped a bomb that the FBI was reopening its investigation in the Clinton email scandal based on new evidence discovered in a “unrelated” case.
This “unrelated” case ended up being very related. The case he spoke of was the FBI investigation of Anthony Weiner husband of Huma Abedin.

clinton-huma

FBI forensic evidence was found on a laptop shared by Weiner and Abedin. This led to the discovery of “10’s of thousands” of Abedin work related emails.

Ms. Abedin was Hillary’s closest adviser.
Routinely Hillary would forward to Huma emails to print because Hillary could not figure out how to print and did not like to work off of a computer. This will show that Hillary removed multiple “top secret” and “Classified” emails from a secure system. This is a crime. Ms. Abedin it is rumored also worked with Cheryl Mills to reclassify emails or strip them of their markings which is another crime. Huma also signed documents upon leaving the state dept that she had surrendered all documents related to her service.
Ms. Abedin and Mills were also Clinton’s interface with the Clinton foundation and would decide who got favors or to meet with Clinton. It has been shown that preference was given to Clinton Foundation Donors who had donated large sums of cash to the foundation or paid Bill, Hillary and Chelsea obscene amounts of cash for speaking engagements or “pay to play”. This also included foreign governments and corporations including Muslim organizations and countries.  It is also widely known that Ms. Abedin has worked for and her family works for radical Muslim organizations. (If it is shown that Ms. Abedin shared any of these Clinton emails with her family or foreign organizations this is another crime not only by Abedin but by Hillary Clinton who let the classified information be stolen.)

This is very significant because these emails are related to 2 or more different FBI investigations.
The Clinton email scandal, an ongoing investigation into the Clinton foundation based on RICO charges and maybe foreign espionage.

On July 5th this Pirate watched as James Comey laid out the evidence the FBI had gathered to date on Hillary Clinton. As he spoke I knew that he had enough to bring charges against Hillary Clinton for lying, destruction of evidence, mishandling government property and more. Then at the last moment he announced that he “did not believe that any prosecutor would convict her.” This was because he was under pressure from Loretta Lynch to say this.  Later under oath in front of a congressional panel Director Comey testified that he had evidence that Clinton WAS guilty of many crimes.

hillary-clinton-email-un-20150310

Just days before Ms. Lynch met with Bill Clinton on a tarmac in Phoenix, AZ. in a “secret” meeting that was discovered by a local reporter. In this meeting President Clinton either threatened Ms. Lynch or made promises to bribe her. Either way the fix was in.

Over the next few months there was public outrage and rebellion inside the FBI as 1000’s of career agents who knew there was plenty of evidence to prosecute her protested not only to Comey but as “unnamed sources.”

More evidence also came out from Wikileaks that showed that the Clinton criminal enterprise was misleading the public, telling the media how to rig polls, hiring criminals to disrupt Trump rallies and exposing that Podesta was aware of a upcoming assassination or as he stated “Wet Works” just days before Justice Scalia was found dead / murdered.

The final straw was when it was discovered that Hillary Clinton had raised over a Million Dollars for a PAC run by Terry McAuliffe the governor of Virginia and a close Clinton Allie.
McAuliffe then donated over $500,000 to the campaign fund of a senior FBI agent Andrew McAbe who would be the key agent on the Clinton email investigation and may have been the source in the FBI who granted approval for many forms of immunity for almost every Clinton aid in the investigation. In my opinion this pushed Comey over the edge and led to the trap being laid.

Once the announcement of the reopening was made the Clinton campaign went ballistic.
They are now demanding that the FBI release more information. I think that this week the FBI will announce more info. If I am correct Comey will come out and disclose some of what was found on the Weiner computer was Hillary Clinton Classified information. He will also announce the investigation of the Clinton foundation and his recommendation that it be presented to either a Grand Jury or a Special Prosecutor.

What is not in doubt is that the Clinton’s are running a criminal organization and are not honest. They also have no regard for security procedures and are only interested in enriching themselves.

Based on evidence there is no way that Hilary Clinton can be allowed to become President of the United States.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-30/doug-band-john-podesta-if-story-gets-out-we-are-screwed

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-30/former-fbi-asst-director-accuses-clintons-being-crime-family

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/10/29/who-huma-abedin-hillary-clintons-right-hand-woman/92956668/

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-29/fbi-found-tens-thousands-emails-belonging-huma-abedin-weiners-laptop

 

Clinton and Huma, How big could this be?

Musings from the Poop Deck. Opinion ****Throwback!!!

We learned in the Clinton email investigation that Huma would forward Clinton emails to print them.
What we did not know until August was that Huma was sending these emails to another email address and printing them at home. (This was uncovered  by Judicial Watch).

Per Truthfeed:

As WND reported Sept. 8, Clinton forwarded an Aug. 8, 2009, email – clearly marked “Classified” – to a personal, nonsecure email address registered to aide Abedin, huma@clintonemail.com. Abedin then forwarded the message to another personal, nonsecure account, humamabedin@yahoo.com.

In sworn testimony before Congress, however, Clinton declared, “There was nothing marked classified on my emails, either sent or received.”

The 2009 email, sent to Clinton from longtime adviser Sidney Blumenthal, was discovered in a cache of emails obtained by Judicial Watch through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The exchange concerned the “disastrous nature” of an Obama trip to Germany, charging the U.S. was “totally out of the loop in Berlin – no ambassador,” resulting in the expectation that “Germans and Russians will now cut their own separate deals on energy, regional security, etc.”

WND also reported two-thirds of Abedin’s released emails were forwarded to personal addresses she controlled and Clinton’s State Department chief of staff, Cheryl Mills, may have received classified information through personal email accounts.

Now what if Huma was not deleting them from her personal account and they were downloading to her home PC? What if she was then printing classified emails at home on a computer with her husband?

Now do not ask me why the FBI never raided the Weiner household in the initial Clinton Email investigation. It was either a cover up or Comey knew it was a whitewash.

Then Weiner sexted the teen. There was another investigation opened. Their house was raided and all electronics this time were taken for proper  forensic analysis by the FBI.

This would also include records from their personal email addresses hosted by yahoo and google who would have all records of all Huma’s activities.And Cheryl Mills who had immunity ONLY FOR HER LAPTOP!

So now the FBI finds 1000’s of emails that Huma did not think to delete, or may have deleted leaving trace evidence that would be easy for the FBI to recover.

Now if Clinton gave Huma the classified information essentially removing the the info from the secure system this is a crime by Hillary. If it shows Huma and Cheryl transferring classified info onto commercial systems like Yahoo and Google that is another crime.

This also begs to ask, what else could Huma (the daughter of radical Islamic Brotherhood radicals) do with all the printed classified emails.

This could get much bigger…

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/hillary-sent-marked-classified-info-to-nonsecure-abedin-account/3634174/

The Pirate

Exposed: Muslim Brotherhood Operatives in the U.S.

 

Exposed: Muslim Brotherhood Operatives in the U.S.

November 1, 2013 By  8 Comments

 

Muslim-Brotherhood-EgyptEl Watan, one of Egypt’s most widely circulated and read newspapers, published a report discussing the Muslim Brotherhood’s influence over the United States, especially in the context of inciting pro-Brotherhood policies against Egypt’s popular June 30 Revolution, which resulted in the ousting of Muhammad Morsi and the Brotherhood from power.

Titled (in translation), “With Names, Identities, and Roadmap…  El WatanExposes Brotherhood Cells in America,” it’s written by investigative journalist Ahmed al-Tahiri, who begins the report by saying:

In the context of El Watan’songoing investigation concerning the Brotherhood’s cells and lobby inside America that support the regime of the ousted [Morsi], and which intensified their activities to attack and defame the June 30 Revolution, informed sources have disclosed to El Watannewspaper the names and cell entities of the Brotherhood and their roadmap of activities all throughout the United States of America.

The sources said that these organizations, which are spread throughout the States, agitated for and were supportive of the decisions taken by Muhammad Morsi’s project to “Brotherhoodize” and consolidate power [in Egypt] and gave a favorable opinion to the general American public that Morsi’s decisions were welcomed by the public [in Egypt]. Following the June 30 Revolution, these groups launched a malicious war in order to incite the American administration to take hostile decisions against Egypt, with the aim of bringing back the Brotherhood to the power.

El Watan then goes on to name names, saying that the following activists and entities are Brotherhood operatives working within the United States (reproduced verbatim):

• Union of Egyptian Imams in North America, represented by Sheikh Muhammad al-Bani

• The Egyptian American Foundation for Development

• Dr. Khalid Lamada, New York

• Dr. Hassan al-Sayah, Virginia

• The Egyptian Network in America, led by Dr. Muhammad Helmi

• Dr. Akram al-Zand, Sa’ad Foundation

• Muhammad al-Khashab, Head of ART channels in America

• Sameh al-Henawi, member, Business Association of America

• Dr. Hany Saqr, member, Egyptian Association in America

• Dr. Khalid Hassan, Maryland

• Dr. Muhammad Abdel Hakem, Seattle

• Dr. Ahmed Ismat al-Bendari, President, Islamic Society of America

• Walid Yusari, Chicago

• Ahmed Shadid, New Jersey

• Ahmed al-Hatab, Indiana

• Dr. Muhammad Morjan, Boston

• Ramadan Ridwan, Houston

• Ahmed Fayez, Las Vegas

• Dr. Amru Abbas, member, Egyptian Foundation in Michigan

• Dr. Safi al-Din Hamed, Pennsylvania

• Dr. Hamdy Radwan, North Carolina

• Ahmed Shehata, Director, Egyptian American Organization for Democracy and Human Rights

• Dr. Iman Shehata, New York

• Dr. Muhammad Amru Attawiya, member, Organization of Islamic Relief in the United States

• Dr. Khalid al-Sayes, member, Rebuilding of Egypt Foundation

• Dr. Tariq Hussein, member, American Islamic Relations Council (CAIR)

• Dr Hisham al-Gayar, member, Egyptian Foundation, Michigan

• Amin Mahmoud, Maryland

As a most recent example, El Watan quotes from an American op-ed published on October 16 (just two days before the publication of the El Watan report itself).  Titled “Egypt: 100 days later” and written by Ahmed Shehata of the Egyptian American Organization for Democracy and Human Rights, the piece appeared in The Hill, the Capitol’s most widely circulated newspaper, published specifically for Congress.

The op-ed is certainly a prime example of pro-Muslim Brotherhood propaganda that actually tries to “shame” U.S. policymakers into returning the Brotherhood back to power in the name of “democracy.”

Key excerpts follow:

While the U.S. must consider its own interests in the region, it is baffling and disheartening to think the current administration would choose to discount the suffering that continues to occur on a daily basis as well as the complete violation of democratic principles which it espouses to the rest of the world….  As this past week marked 100 days since the coup and the lives of the Egyptian people continue to be sacrificed, the United States cannot be silent any longer for the sake of their own interests and convenience….  To that end, Egypt represents a golden opportunity for the U.S. to uphold democratic values by pushing for the reinstatement of the democratically elected government, despite their shortcomings. This would aid tremendously in showing the world that, above any one particular physical interest, stands the mantle of freedom and the rule of law.

Anyone familiar with the real happenings of Egypt knows that Shehata’s assertions are complete opposites of the truth: the military ousted the Brotherhood in response to the will of millions of Egyptians—the people, thedemos, as in democracy—who took to the streets protesting against the totalitarian Morsi government.  Moreover, it is the Muslim Brotherhood and their supporters who have been committing numerous human rights atrocities—including the slaughter and persecution of Christians, the torture and murder of many Egyptians (including before the revolution), and the destruction and torching of some 85 Christian churches.

Shehata seems to think that, if the Muslim Brotherhood and their supporters terrorize, murder, destroy, persecute, and betray their nation—which is precisely why tens of millions of average Egyptians rose up against them (though you might not know that following Al Jazeera-led Western media that distorted the popularity of the revolution)—as long as they won “elections” (which from the start many authorities insisted they didn’t), then that is all that matters; and, if need be, the U.S. must war with Egypt’s military and people on behalf of the ousted terrorists—all in the name of “democracy” and “human rights,” as Shehata’s U.S.-based Brotherhood front is laughably called.

That such a shameless piece of Muslim Brotherhood propaganda can be published in the most influential and widely read Capitol Hill publication certainly goes a long way in validating El Watan’s claims that the Brotherhood has its tentacles all around the United States’ points of influence.

Could Clinton policy and ties to #Morsi and Muslim Brotherhood crush her Presidential aspirations?

 

U.S. Ambassador Anne Patterson has become the public face in Egypt of America’s policy failure there. Now, she is charged with restoring not only U.S. relations with the world’s most populous Arab nation, but her own reputation as well.

US Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson
A photograph of U.S. Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson is burned outside the Ministry of Defense in Cairo, Egypt, on June 28, 2013. (Keith Lane/MCT, via Getty)

On paper, Patterson seemed like the ideal diplomat to guide U.S. involvement in Egypt during its transition from six decades of military rule to democracy, given her experience in politically volatile countries such as Colombia and Pakistan. An unusually influential ambassador, she played a major role in forming the U.S. approach to the Muslim Brotherhood and its Freedom and Justice Party led by Mohamed Morsi, the elected president who was arrested and removed from office by the Egyptian Army a week ago after tens of millions of Egyptians took to the streets to protest his rule.

But while her American defenders credit Patterson with taking a realistic approach to a volatile situation, many in the Egyptian opposition regard her as the person responsible for America’s close embrace of Islamists in Egypt. During the protests that led to the fall of Morsi’s government, her face, crossed out with a red X, became the symbol for many Egyptians of what they saw as U.S. discouragement of their efforts.

 “Some say that street action will produce better results than elections,” Patterson said in a June 18 speech. “To be honest, my government and I are deeply skeptical.”

To many in Egypt and some in Washington, Patterson’s comments were only the latest example of her failure to recognize the Morsi government’s bad behavior and her reluctance to use her office to publicly press it to address the grievances of the Egyptian people.

“Rather than understand and remedy the perception that the U.S. is supporting the Muslim Brotherhood, Ambassador Patterson is continuing the age-old U.S. practice in Egypt of being the last man standing to support an authoritarian regime. In so doing, the U.S. is once again putting itself in an increasingly lonely camp, contributing to ongoing instability, and hurting its own image and credibility with the Egyptian people,” Egyptian activist and lawyer Dina Guirgui wrote at the time.

Now, the U.S. governmentdespite urging the military not to topple Egypt’s president—is tacitly endorsing Morsi’s ouster after the fact. The White House has refused to characterize the events as a “coup,” and declined to call for Morsi to be returned to power. Patterson, now administering a Cairo embassy that is closed most days to the public and reduced to minimal staffing due to ordered departures of nonessential staff, is part of the effort to get the Muslim Brotherhood to return to the political process, an awkward and difficult task considering they were forcibly removed from power after winning elections the United States said were free and fair.

What’s happening in Egypt right now? Is it a military coup or not?

“It is far easier for the Egyptians to find foreign conspiracies than to look at themselves in the mirror,”

“We will continue to encourage the Muslim Brotherhood, leaders from that group, to participate in the process. We know this is not going to be an easy process, but that’s what we’ll continue to encourage,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Tuesday. “I think that it’s safe to assume that Ambassador Patterson is very engaged in this process, as are a number of other officials, but she’s also engaged with a broad range of officials on the ground.”

Back in Washington, officials and experts debate whether or not the failure of U.S. policy in Egypt since the 2011 ouster of Hosni Mubarak is really Patterson’s fault. Many point to the fact that Patterson argued internally for a policy focused on Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, even pushing for a Morsi visit to the White House that never occurred.

She personally pushed for then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to visit Cairo last June, a trip that turned out to be a disaster as Egyptians pelted Clinton’s motorcadewith tomatoes, chanted about Monica Lewinsky, and promoted conspiracy theoriesthat Clinton aide Huma Abedin was part of a Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy to control the Egyptian government.

 “She was pushing for a tight embrace of Morsi. Her view was we need to lock this relationship down. Meanwhile, she alienated the opposition. It was both unwise and unnecessary,” one former Obama administration official told The Daily Beast. “She was telling a lot of people that the opposition was useless, that there was no point investing time in them, that the Muslim Brotherhood was the only game in town.”

In internal discussions, Patterson downplayed the steps the Morsi government’s authoritarian tendencies and failed to respond forcefully to abuses such as the Egyptian government raids on American NGOs, many critics said. Plus, she didn’t foresee the street protests scheduled for June 30 leading to the dramatic events of the past 10 days, leaving the U.S. unprepared.

“The whole point of this revolutionary period is that it is very dynamic and you have to hedge your bets,” the official said. “At every point she misread what was happening.”

Another former Obama administration official outlined for The Daily Beast the defense of Patterson: that she was doing her best to implement a White House policy meant to correct decades where the United States failed to engage the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist groups in Egypt.

“Anne has, since her first days in Egypt, noted that the Egyptians who are favorite contacts of Washington think tanks, congressional staffers, State Department types, and so forth are perhaps talented and creative and admirable individuals but do not necessarily represent 80 million Egyptians,” this official said. “She basically has argued that we need to grasp that there is a conservative, religious, traditional part of Egyptian society that probably isn’t identifying with the favorite pets of the Washington think tank crowd.”

Moreover, said this official, Patterson is taking flak because she is the prominent representative in Cairo of an American government that is always the target of Egyptian ire, no matter what the U.S. does or does not do.

“Let us remember that, in situations like this, the U.S. cannot win in the court of Egyptian public opinion. It is far easier for the Egyptians to find foreign conspiracies than to look at themselves in the mirror,” the official said. “It’s one thing for the Egyptians to believe Anne Patterson is evil, but Washington surely can see what is really going on. Washington should not punish Anne Patterson for Egyptian escapism, fantasy, and xenophobia.”

Throughout Patterson’s career, she has worked closely with weak civilian governments threatened by armed insurgencies and the prospect for military rule. She distinguished herself as a senior diplomat working on South American counter-narcotics in the 1990s during a U.S. military aid program for Colombia known as Plan Colombia. Patterson was rewarded with an ambassadorship in Bogota in 2000 where she developed a close partnership with President Andres Pastrana at the time, insisting that he would be the public face of his country’s counter-insurgency as opposed to the generals in the country’s military that had earned a reputation for human rights abuses and drug running.

Her experience in Colombia prepared her for her next big assignment, as the American ambassador to Pakistan. When Patterson arrived in Islamabad in 2007, Pervez Musharraf, the former chief of the country’s military was also the president after he seized power in a 1999 coup and assumed the presidency in 2001. Musharraf was also unpopular and weak. Over time, Patterson worked behind the scenes with other elements of the country’s civil society to plot a transition to an elected, civilian government. But Patterson’s style meant she did her work behind the scenes and out of the public spotlight.

“In Pakistan she realized Musharraf was far too weak,” said Husain Haqqani, the Pakistani ambassador to Washington appointed after Musharraf resigned his office in 2007. “She reached out to all particular factions and did not say anything publicly about Musharraf. She was talking to everyone to understand what was happening and to see if the United States could move in a direction in which to help American policy.”

Several Obama administration officials tell The Daily Beast that her experiences working to restore civilian rule in Pakistan and bolstering Pastrana in Colombia shaped her perceptions of Egypt. “Ambassador Patterson was against public criticism of Morsi,” one State Department official told the Daily Beast. “She wanted the United States to support the elected Egyptian government and not be perceived as entering into Egyptian politics.”

But that approach meant that the forces aligned against Morsi have felt abandoned by her, said Jon Alterman, director of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“Somehow she made the opposition feel like that they were the enemy and it’s never good to have any part of the political structure feel like they were the enemy. A more successful diplomatic strategy would have made sure nobody felt they were the enemy,” he said. “They just felt they didn’t respect them. It’s hard to imagine that was a message she wanted to send but that’s the message that many in the opposition received.”

At the same time, the White House deserves some blame for what’s happening to Patterson, Alterman said, because it failed to threaten Egypt’s government with tough messages when it counted. The ambassador is supposed to be the good cop, but there was no bad cop to balance her out. “Any ambassador maintaining a relationship with a regime that is turning more oppressive needs a countervailing voice in the policy and I haven’t heard about one,” Alterman said.

Now Patterson may be up for a promotion that would take her out of Cairo; President Obama has reportedly considered nominating her to be the next assistant secretary of State for near eastern affairs. But the prospective confirmation process would likely be complicated by her recent notoriety, which could scare the White House away from going through with the move.

“Even if the Egyptians blame Anne as a symbol of purported messages that in hindsight seem ill advised, one hopes the White House would not punish her for carrying out faithfully its bidding,” one former administration official said. “I do wince in reading her public remarks on June 18. I’m sure she herself would edit those remarks, if she could. But even if the Egyptian people now see her and judge her activities only in the context of those remarks, Washington can surely have a more sophisticated understanding of the role she played.”

Bombshell Obama Vetting: 1979 Newspaper Article By Valerie Jarrett Father-In-Law Reveals Start Of Muslim Purchase Of U.S. Presidency « Pat Dollard

Why would Muslim oil billionaires finance and develop controlling relationships with black college students? Well, like anyone else, they would do it for self-interest. And what would their self-interest be? We all know the top two answers to that question: 1. a Palestinian state and 2. the advancement of Islam in America. The idea then was to advance blacks who would facilitate these two goals to positions of power in the Federal government, preferably, of course, the Presidency. And why would the Arabs target blacks in particular for this job? Well, for the same reason the early communists chose them as their vanguard for revolution (which literally means “change”) in America. Allow me to quote Trotsky, in 1939: “The American Negroes, for centuries the most oppressed section of American society and the most discriminated against, are potentially the most revolutionary element of the population. They are designated by their historical past to be, under adequate leadership, the very vanguard of the proletarian revolution.” Substitute the word “Islam” for the words “the proletarian revolution,” and you most clearly get the picture, as Islam is a revolutionary movement just like communism is. (Trivia: it is from this very quote that Van Jones takes his name. Van is short for vanguard. He was born “Anthony”). In addition, long before 1979, blacks had become the vanguard of the spread of Islam in America, especially in prisons.

Interestingly, in context with the fact that this article was written by her father-in-law, Valerie Jarrett has an unusual amount of influence over Obama (along with personal security that may be even better than his, another unusual and intriguing bit of business here). And equally interesting is that Obama, who may have been a beneficiary of this Muslim money, and may now be in this Muslim debt, has aggressively pursued both of the Muslim agendas I cited above. And, also equally interesting, is that Obama has paid a king’s ransom for court ordered seals of any such records of this potential financing of his college education, and perhaps, of other of his expenses.

Lastly, it’s very important to note that the main source for the article is Khalid Mansour, “the same lawyer who allegedly helped arrange for the entrance of Barack Obama into Harvard Law School in 1988.” (Valerie Jarrett, by the way, was born in Iran. The one country protected by Obama from the sweep of the Arab Spring.) Now all of this may seem sensational, but let’s face facts. What makes it most disturbing is that not only is it all logical, but it suddenly makes a lot of previously confusing things make perfect sense. – Pat Dollard

via Bombshell Obama Vetting: 1979 Newspaper Article By Valerie Jarrett Father-In-Law Reveals Start Of Muslim Purchase Of U.S. Presidency « Pat Dollard.

How long until CONUS suffers it’s next terrorist attack? And how ill Obama classify it?

There are 100’s of sleeper cells now in the U.S.
Our borders are for the most part unprotected.
How long until our next major terrorist attack?
Obama has set the table with his coddling of the muslim brotherhood.
The White Houses refusal to recognize the Sept 11th attacks as terrorism proves that the current administration is a complete failure in foreign policy and has their heads in the sand.
When Israel attacks Iran, be prepared to defend the homeland.
All Sheepdogs must remain vigilant!