Why Polls are wrong on Clinton lead

Here is the Quinnipiac latest Poll.

First it does not show sample size.

2nd it is an ANTI Trump Poll.

Notice the NEGATIVE questions they ask:
8. As you may know, there is a recently released tape in which Donald Trump brags about
sexually assaulting women. Trump has since apologized and said that these comments were
simply “locker room talk”. In deciding your vote for president, is what Trump said in
that video a deal breaker, a big deal but not a deal breaker, or not a big deal?

9. As you may know, multiple women have recently said that Donald Trump groped or made
inappropriate sexual advances towards them without their consent. Trump has denied these
allegations, calling them lies. Do you believe that Donald Trump committed these actions,
or not?

10. In deciding your vote for president, are the allegations that Donald Trump groped or
made inappropriate sexual advances towards women a deal breaker, a big deal but not a
deal breaker, or not a big deal?

Please notice that there is not ONE question involving Clinton Emails, Lies, Clinton foundation illegal donations or Bills infidelities.

This poll also relied on HEAVY Democrat states.

This is the RIGGING of the election.

 

CLINTON TOPS TRUMP BY 7 POINTS,
QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY NATIONAL POLL FINDS;
MOST VOTERS SAY MEDIA IS BIASED AGAINST TRUMP
Republican Donald Trump’s lead among men and white voters all but vanishes as Democrat
Hillary Clinton takes a 47 – 40 percent likely voter lead, with 7 percent for Libertarian Party
candidate Gary Johnson and 1 percent for Green Party candidate Jill Stein, according to a
Quinnipiac University national poll released today.
This compares to a 45 – 40 percent Clinton lead in an October 7 survey by the
independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University.
Today, men are divided with 43 percent for Trump and 41 percent for Clinton. Women
back Clinton 52 – 37 percent.
White voters go 45 percent for Trump and 41 percent for Clinton, while non-white voters
back Clinton 63 – 25 percent.
In a head-to-head, two-way race, Clinton tops Trump 50 – 44 percent.
The news media is biased against Trump, American likely voters say 55 – 42 percent,
including Republicans 88 – 8 percent and independent voters 61 – 37 percent. Democrats say
77 – 20 percent that the media is not biased.
American likely voters believe 51 – 31 percent that Trump assaulted several women.
Democrats believe it 84 – 5 percent and independent voters believe it 45 – 34 percent.
Republicans don’t believe it 56 – 22 percent.
“Donald Trump made the charge, and American likely voters agree: There IS a media
bias against the GOP contender,” said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac
University Poll.
“But does that explain his lackluster standing with his core base?”
-moreTim
Malloy, Assistant Director
(203) 645-8043
Rubenstein
Pat Smith (212) 843-8026
2
Quinnipiac University Poll/October 19, 2016 – page 2
Trump does not have a sense of decency, American likely voters say 59 – 36 percent and
he is not fit to be president, voters say 58 – 38 percent.
Clinton does have a sense of decency, voters say 55 – 42 percent, but they are divided on
whether she is fit to be president, as 47 percent say yes and 49 percent say no.
“Media bias or not, Trump’s character issues have ominous implications,” Malloy said.
“The consensus opinion is that Trump groped women and is neither fit enough nor a decent
enough person to be President.”
From October 17 – 18, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,007 likely voters
nationwide with a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percentage points. Live interviewers call
landlines and cell phones.
The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts
public opinion surveys in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida,
Ohio, Virginia, Iowa, Colorado, North Carolina, Georgia and the nation as a public
service and for research.
Visit http://www.qu.edu/polling or http://www.facebook.com/quinnipiacpoll
Call (203) 582-5201, or follow us on Twitter @QuinnipiacPoll.
3
1. If the presidential election were being held today, and the candidates were
Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine the Democrats, Donald Trump and Mike Pence the Republicans,
Gary Johnson and Bill Weld the Libertarians, and Jill Stein and Ajamu Baraka the Green
party candidates, for whom would you vote? (If undecided) As of today, do you lean more
toward Clinton and Kaine, Trump and Pence, Johnson and Weld, or Stein and Baraka?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Clinton and Kaine 47% 7% 91% 38% 41% 52% 46% 35%
Trump and Pence 40 80 4 42 43 37 42 49
Johnson and Weld 7 6 3 11 10 4 7 9
Stein and Baraka 1 2 1 2 1 2 – 2
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 – 1 – 1 1 –
DK/NA 5 4 2 6 5 4 3 5
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Clinton and Kaine 57% 47% 43% 46% 36% 45% 41% 63%
Trump and Pence 20 35 48 47 49 42 45 25
Johnson and Weld 19 8 4 1 10 6 8 4
Stein and Baraka 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 – – – 1 1 –
DK/NA 1 6 4 5 3 5 4 5
2. If the only candidates were Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine the Democrats and
Donald Trump and Mike Pence the Republicans, for whom would you vote? (If undecided) As
of today, do you lean more toward Clinton and Kaine or Trump and Pence?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Clinton and Kaine 50% 10% 93% 41% 44% 55% 49% 39%
Trump and Pence 44 86 4 49 48 40 46 55
SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 – 1 – 1 1 –
DK/NA 6 4 3 8 8 4 4 6
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Clinton and Kaine 63% 51% 45% 46% 40% 48% 44% 65%
Trump and Pence 32 39 50 49 55 46 50 28
SMONE ELSE(VOL) – 1 1 – 1 1 1 –
DK/NA 4 8 4 5 5 5 5 7
*Results based on total sample, only asked of respondents who did not choose Clinton or
Trump Q1. Respondents who named Clinton or Trump in Q1 assigned to initial preference.
4
3. Compared to past presidential elections, how would you describe your level of
motivation to vote in this year’s presidential election; are you more motivated than
usual, less motivated, or about the same as usual?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
More 53% 56% 52% 54% 50% 55% 54% 52%
Less 17 21 14 17 19 15 13 20
About the same 29 22 34 29 30 28 33 27
DK/NA 1 1 – 1 – 1 – 2
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
More 46% 48% 55% 58% 51% 55% 53% 52%
Less 28 23 11 13 17 15 16 18
About the same 26 30 33 27 32 28 30 30
DK/NA – – 1 2 – 2 1 –
4. Would you say that Hillary Clinton is fit to be President of the United States or not?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Yes 47% 11% 86% 41% 43% 51% 51% 36%
No 49 86 11 56 54 45 48 59
DK/NA 4 2 3 3 3 5 1 4
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Yes 52% 50% 44% 47% 41% 47% 44% 56%
No 45 47 52 49 58 49 53 37
DK/NA 2 4 4 4 1 4 3 6
5. Would you say that Donald Trump is fit to be President of the United States or not?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Yes 38% 71% 4% 42% 43% 33% 40% 46%
No 58 27 93 52 53 62 58 49
DK/NA 4 3 2 6 4 5 3 5
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Yes 24% 33% 44% 41% 50% 36% 43% 24%
No 74 64 50 53 48 58 54 70
DK/NA 2 3 5 6 2 6 4 6
5
6. Would you say that Hillary Clinton has a sense of decency or not?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Yes 55% 21% 92% 47% 49% 59% 52% 48%
No 42 75 7 50 48 37 46 49
DK/NA 3 5 1 2 3 3 3 3
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Yes 73% 53% 48% 53% 45% 55% 50% 67%
No 25 44 48 44 52 43 47 28
DK/NA 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 5
7. Would you say that Donald Trump has a sense of decency or not?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Yes 36% 64% 7% 40% 45% 28% 35% 43%
No 59 31 90 54 51 66 61 51
DK/NA 5 4 3 6 4 6 4 6
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Yes 24% 31% 41% 41% 47% 31% 39% 28%
No 76 65 52 55 48 64 56 66
DK/NA – 4 7 4 4 5 5 6
8. As you may know, there is a recently released tape in which Donald Trump brags about
sexually assaulting women. Trump has since apologized and said that these comments were
simply “locker room talk”. In deciding your vote for president, is what Trump said in
that video a deal breaker, a big deal but not a deal breaker, or not a big deal?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Deal breaker 27% 5% 48% 24% 21% 31% 29% 21%
Big deal/Nt deal br. 35 36 34 36 36 34 34 33
Not a big deal 35 59 11 38 41 29 33 43
DK/NA 4 1 7 2 2 5 4 3
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Deal breaker 34% 29% 24% 23% 20% 30% 25% 31%
Big deal/Nt deal br. 47 36 32 30 34 32 33 37
Not a big deal 19 33 38 42 44 32 38 27
DK/NA 1 2 6 5 1 5 3 5
6
9. As you may know, multiple women have recently said that Donald Trump groped or made
inappropriate sexual advances towards them without their consent. Trump has denied these
allegations, calling them lies. Do you believe that Donald Trump committed these actions,
or not?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Yes 51% 22% 84% 45% 44% 56% 50% 45%
No 31 56 5 34 37 26 31 37
DK/NA 19 22 11 21 19 18 19 18
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Yes 64% 55% 44% 50% 42% 53% 48% 61%
No 20 28 37 31 40 29 34 22
DK/NA 16 17 19 19 18 19 18 17
10. In deciding your vote for president, are the allegations that Donald Trump groped or
made inappropriate sexual advances towards women a deal breaker, a big deal but not a
deal breaker, or not a big deal?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Deal breaker 28% 8% 52% 22% 22% 34% 30% 23%
Big deal/Nt deal br. 34 32 34 39 35 34 34 33
Not a big deal 33 59 10 33 39 28 33 42
DK/NA 4 1 4 6 4 4 3 3
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Deal breaker 46% 32% 22% 21% 20% 33% 26% 35%
Big deal/Nt deal br. 35 32 36 35 34 33 33 37
Not a big deal 15 32 38 40 43 32 37 23
DK/NA 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 5
11. Do you think that the news media is biased against Donald Trump or not?
LIKELY VOTERS……………………………………
WHITE……
COLLEGE DEG
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes No
Yes/Biased 55% 88% 20% 61% 61% 49% 51% 66%
No/Not biased 42 8 77 37 36 47 45 32
DK/NA 3 4 3 2 2 4 4 2
AGE IN YRS………….. WHITE…..
18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ Men Wom Wht NonWht
Yes/Biased 60% 51% 56% 52% 66% 51% 58% 45%
No/Not biased 39 48 39 45 32 45 39 51
DK/NA 2 1 5 3 1 4 3 5

https://www.qu.edu/images/polling/us/us10192016_U29frgv.pdf

Advertisements

Proof Aliens visited earth a long time ago?

A piece of aluminium that looks as if it was handmade is being hailed as 250,000-year-old proof that aliens once visited Earth.

Metallic aluminium was not really produced by mankind until around 200 years ago, so the discovery of the large chunk that could be up to 250,000 years old is being held as a sensational find.

The details of the discovery were never made public at the time because it was pulled out of the earth in communist Romania in 1973.

Builders working on the shores of the Mures River not far from the central Romanian town of Aiud found three objects 10 metres (33 feet) under the ground.

They appeared to be unusual and very old, and archaeologists were bought in who immediately identified two of them as being fossils.

The third looked to be a piece of man-made metal, although very light, and it was suspected that it might be the end of an axe.

All three were sent together with the others for further analysis to Cluj, the main city of the Romanian region of Transylvania.

Ancient object

it was quickly determined that the two large bones belonged to a large extinct mammal that died 10,000-80,000 years ago, but experts were stunned to find out that the third object was a piece of very lightweight metal, and appeared to have been manufactured.

According to tests, the object is made of 12 metals, 90% aluminium, and it was dated by Romanian officials as being 250,000 years old. The initial results were later confirmed by a lab in Lausanne, Switzerland.

Other experts who conducted later tests said the dates were far alter, ranging between 400 and 80,000 years old, but even at 400 years old it would still be 200 years earlier than when aluminium was first produced.

The object is 20 centimetres (7.8 inches) long, 12.5 centimetres (4.9 inches) wide and 7 centimetres (2.8 inches) thick.

What puzzled experts is that the piece of metal has concavities that make it look as if it was manufactured as part of a more complex mechanical system.

Now a heated debate is going on that the object is actually part of a UFO and proof of visitation by an alien civilisation in the past.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/experts-believe-mysterious-aluminium-object-9086060

Hillaries Smoking GUN Proof of BRIBES

Here is EVIDENCE that Hillary and her staff solicited donations in a PAY for PLAY scheme. HUMA was actively involved in solicitations for HILLARY while at State working for Clinton and solicited MILLIONS for the CLINTON FOUNDATION!

Re: FYI CGI Africa

Why Clinton cannot and should not be elected. She is already disqualified

18 U.S. Code § 2071 – Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

(a)

Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b)

Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994,108 Stat. 2147.)

Best case for Donald Trump for President

Last night a friend claimed that Donald Trump wouldn’t make a good president; he is brash, he is racist, he is a loudmouth; you know the normal things people learn to recite after being programmed by television news. The one I loved was that, “Trump is arrogant.” My friend questioned if one man could make “that much difference in the world today.” To my friend’s credit, she was respectful enough to let me respond when she asked, “Really, what has Trump done?”
I said, “In June of last year, Trump entered the race for president. In just a little over a year, Trump has single handedly defeated the Republican party. He did so thoroughly. In fact, he did so in such a resounding way that the Republican Party now suffers from an identity crisis. He literally dismantled the party. Trump even dismantled and dismissed the brand and value of the Bush family.
Trump has Obama petrified that Trump will dismiss programs that weren’t properly installed using proper law.
Trump has single handedly debunked and disemboweled any value of news media as we knew it—news now suffering from an all-time level of distrust and disrespect.
Trump has leaders from all over the world talking about him, whether good or bad. Trust me, powerful men who have been president before weren’t liked by the global community. I doubt Mikhail Gorbachev liked Reagan when Reagan said, “Tear down that wall.”
Trump has expressly disclosed the fraud perpetrated on the American public by Hillary Clinton. He has, quite literally, brought Hillary to her knees—if you believe that nervous tension and disorders offer physical side effects and damage.
Trump has unified the silent majority in a way that should be patently frightening to “liberals.”
As the press accuses Trump of being a house of cards, Trump has proven the press is the real house of cards. He has whipped up the entire establishment into pure panic. Trump has exposed them for who they are and worse, what they are. George Clooney was right when he said Trump draws live news coverage of his podium that he’s not yet approached. Thanks, George, you were perfectly correct.
What we see as headline news today are actually the last bubbles from the ship that is now sunk—meaning the standard news media, as a propaganda machine, has been exposed. They have no more value.
In the same way Trump asked the African-American community this question, I asked my friend, ”At this point, what do you have to lose?” We have mass cop shootings, riots in our streets, ambushed cops, double digit inflation, bombs blowing up in our cities, targeted police, #BLM, a skyrocketing jobless rate, no economic growth, privately owned land being seized by the federal government, the worst racial tension in my lifetime, no God in schools, more abortions than ever, illegal aliens pouring into our country, sick veterans receiving no care, and a debt that doubled in seven years to $19 trillion. Are you really happy with the condition of the current system?
One man has done all of this in one year—one guy, and on his own dime. And with everything I’ve written above, you believe Trump hasn’t done anything? You claim that you are afraid of Donald Trump? No wonder we’re in trouble. You can say that Trump is a lousy presidential candidate. That’s your right. Just don’t ever say he’s not effective.
That Megan Kelly, FOX News, CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, Rachel Maddow, the Huffington Post, the New York Times, Raleigh’s News and Observer, the AP, Don Lemon, Jake Tapper, and many more, failed to implement their collectively orchestrated lie on the American people against Trump, is actually a massive testament to Trump. The press colluded pure propaganda to accomplish his demise … and they have collectively failed and miserably.
Here’s just one example of how badly America is injured right now. There are high school football players on their knees during the national anthem simply because the press used as propaganda to program those kids to do that very thing. But, these kids are mimicking NFL stars the same way the same kids chooses which brand of football shoe to purchase—they’re overtly brain-washed to do that very thing.
Now, we have a generation of children who hate America.
America’s problem isn’t that little children are on their knee in collective disrespect of America. Our problem is that America is on her knee from collective disrespect by Americans.
You can disrespect America all you want. But, it’s high-time you respect the silent majority. Because they’re not simply the “silent majority” as you’ve been trained to believe when Hillary calls them “deplorables.” The fact is, they are simply the majority. And now they’re no longer silent either. Donald Trump changed all of that, single-handedly and within one year.” From Be Forbes.”
Bebe Coe Bertino
9/29/2016 , this is a copy and paste, and needs to be read and spread!!

Staffer who leaked DNC documents executed in D.C. Is there a serial DNC murderer out there?

Individuals connected with the DNC are being murdered in short order.

Questions: Who did it? Who ordered it?
Get the answers and the DNC is destroyed.

 

BREAKING: Murdered DNC staffer was Wikileaks’ source, Assange admits in interview

In July, a Democratic National Committee staffer named Seth Rich was gunned down in the Bloomingdale neighborhood of northwest D.C.  The police said his murder may have been the result of a robbery.

Now, however, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is saying there is more to the story.

julian

In an interview with a Dutch media outlet known as Nieuwsuur on Tuesday, Assange admitted that Rich, a staffer in the voter data department of the DNC, was Wikileak’s source within the organization.

In recent weeks, Wikileaks has released a torrent of information from inside the DNC — from emails to memos to voicemails — that has resulted in the resignation of top party officials, including Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz.  According to Assange, Rich arranged a large portion of this information.

After Rich’s murder, Assange announced that Wikileaks was offering a $20,000 reward for anyone who could provide information leading to an arrest and conviction in Rich’s murder case.

Assange’s interview with Nieuwsuur on Tuesday was the first time that the Wikileaks founder ever has revealed one of their sources.

The video of Assange’s encounter with the Dutch media outlet can be found at http://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2124316-assange-belooft-nieuwe-onthullingen-over-clinton.html?title=assange-belooft-nieuwe-onthullingen-over-clinton

http://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2016/08/09/clinton-body-count-or-leftwing-conspiracy-three-with-ties-to-dnc-mysteriously-die-n2203000

Clinton Body Count or Left-Wing Conspiracy? Three With Ties to DNC Mysteriously Die
Rachel Alexander
Rachel Alexander
|
Posted: Aug 09, 2016 12:01 AM
Clinton Body Count or Left-Wing Conspiracy? Three With Ties to DNC Mysteriously Die
Trending

hillary-clinton-email-un-20150310

Since the Democratic National Committee emails were leaked a few weeks ago, three people associated with the DNC have all been found dead under what could be questionable circumstances. Some — including Bernie Sanders supporters — suspect the Clintons were behind the deaths, just more episodes in the alleged “Clinton body count” dating back to the 1990s. Others dismiss the speculation as left-wing conspiracy nuts. But until the police have completed their investigations and the medical examiners have released autopsy reports, it is premature to make any determinations.

Seth Rich (See above)

DNC staffer Seth Rich was mysteriously murdered in the streets of Washington, D.C., on July 10. Although it is being investigated as a robbery, his wallet, credit cards and watch were not taken. The 27-year old was shot in the back on July 10 at 4:15 a.m. near his affluent neighborhood, while he was reportedly walking home from his girlfriend’s apartment. Police still have no suspects, witnesses or motive. His mother told the local NBC station that there were bruises on his face, knees and hands, apparently from trying to fend off his attackers.

Some are speculating that Hillary Clinton is behind the murder, because Rich could have been the DNC staffer responsible for leaking the 20,000 damaging DNC emails to Wikileaks. The allegation is that powerful Sanders allies convinced Rich to leak the data. He had previously worked on the U.S. Senate campaign for Nebraska businessman Scott Kleeb, who lost his election. The Clinton Global Initiative provided funds for a clean energy business started by Kleeb, which had come under investigation after losing $300,000 in 2010 and another $300,000 in 2011 despite the subsidies. Rich was also previously employed at a data firm that had worked with the Clintons. After news of possible corruption emerged between the Clinton Global Initiative and Kleeb, supposedly that led to Sanders’ cronies pressuring Rich to leak what was going on.
CARTOONS | Glenn McCoy
View Cartoon

Rich was a data analyst, so it is very possible he could have had access to the DNC’s emails. Julian Assange of Wikileaks said recently on TV that it wasn’t Russian hackers who intercepted the emails, as the Hillary Clinton campaign has alleged; instead, any one of a number of staffers within the DNC could have leaked them.

Emily Zanotti of HeatStreet, who is no leftist, has written a skeptical article about the conspiracy theories surrounding his death, analyzing Reddit threads. Reddit has contributors covering the circumstances of his death extensively, but they aren’t professional journalists, are mostly anonymous and can get things wrong, which hurts the credibility of the speculation.

The myth-debunking site Snopes labeled the suspicion over Rich’s death as false. This is strange, since how does Snopes know that it is false? The police haven’t even completed their investigation yet, which Snopes admits. Many murders go unsolved, including several of the strange deaths of people associated with the Clintons. A $25,000 reward is being offered for information about who killed Rich.

There should be no rush to judgment either way. Two people were robbed at gunpoint within the hour before Rich was murdered, a little over a mile away. If Rich was really the victim of a robbery, why didn’t the robbers take his valuables? It is possible that Rich refused to turn his valuables over, so the robbers shot him, and then fled without the valuables due to the noise from the gunshot. Police investigators will likely speak with the victims of the earlier two robberies and ask if they can recall what the gun looked like to see if the ballistics match the two rounds that killed Rich.

Shawn Lucas

Shawn Lucas, along with filmmaker Ricardo Villaba, served the DNC on July 3 with a complaint and summons in a fraud action on behalf of Sanders supporters. In the video, he can be seen grinning, happy to do it.

On August 2, he was found lying on the bathroom floor dead by his girlfriend when she came home that evening. His girlfriend said he was in good health.

John Ashe

The former President of the United Nations General Assembly, John Ashe, mysteriously passed away on June 22, a few days before he was scheduled to begin pretrial meetings involving shady financial dealings regarding a former Clinton crony. Local police officers said he died from dropping a barbell on his throat while working out, but the UN oddly first claimed he died of a heart attack. The 61-year-old was supposed to testify against Chinese real estate developer Ng Lap Seng, who was implicated in the “Chinagate” scandal for funneling money to the DNC for Bill Clinton through Arkansas restaurant owner Charlie Trie. Ashe was arrested last year for allegedly taking over $3 million in bribes from Chinese businessmen, including over half a million from Ng Lap Se, in exchange for building a United Nations conference center in Macau.

Dominican attorney Henry Shillingford questioned his death, “It is strange for Antigua’s most senior diplomat to be implicated and die under such troubling circumstances.” The New York Post’s Page Six ran a skeptical article questioning the circumstances. A source told the paper, “During the trial, the prosecutors would have linked Ashe to the Clinton bagman Ng. It would have been very embarrassing. His death was conveniently timed.”

However, his widow, Dr Anilla Cherian, said it was the third time that her husband had been found collapsed at their home.

More suspicious deaths recently of people with ties to the Clintons

Victor Thorn, who wrote four books exposing the Clintons, reportedly killed himself with a gun on his 54th birthday, August 1, while on top of a mountain near his Pennsylvania home. The books he wrote were Hillary (And Bill): The Sex Volume, Hillary (And Bill): The Drugs Volume, and Hillary (And Bill): The Murder Volume, and his latest which was published in February, Crowning Clinton: Why Hillary Shouldn’t Be in the White House.

According to the Inqisitr, Thorn had appeared multiple times on The Russell Scott Show and told the host, “Russell, if I’m ever found dead, it was murder. I would never kill myself.”

Joe Montano, an aide to Hillary’s running mate Tim Kaine, died of a heart attack on July 25. He had worked for the DNC and was only 47.

A man named Larry Nichols claimed on the Pete Santilli Show that he was hired as a hitman for the Clintons, and killed several people years ago.

What is comes down to is this: how many other politicians have you heard of who have had so many mysterious deaths associated with them? You don’t hear of a Bush body count — not even an Obama body count. Snopes, the left-leaning internet myth debunker, labels the Clinton body count as false. However, the main site that hosts a list of the Clinton body count reports that is constantly under attack by hackers of Hillary’s.

Regardless of whether there is any truth to the Clintons being behind these deaths, at a very minimum, the gun laws in DC need to be changed to allow people to protect themselves. After being robbed while housesitting for a friend, former Washington Times columnist Emily Miller wrote a book about how difficult it was to obtain a gun for self-protection in DC, Emily Gets Her Gun. Fortunately, there is now ongoing litigation challenging these draconian laws. Whether Rich was killed by robbers or someone else, a gun likely would have saved his life.

This post has been updated to fix an error.

Why Republican establishment is against Trump (not what you think)

What if…

2009 Obama and Clinton are plotting their “Arab Spring” .
Along with destabilizing Libya, Yemen and Egypt they come up with a “Syria solution”
They decide to arm the anti Assad rebels to push Assad to resign.

Clinton takes this to Capitol Hill and gets buyin from senior Republicans and Democrats..

The State Dept and CIA set up shop in Benghazi after they destabilize and KILL Qaddafi.

The US then spends BILLIONS buying up weapons including MANPADS from Libya and start shipping them to Syrian rebels through an intermediary possibly Turkey.

But Syria goes sideways. The “REBELS” thatClinton chose go rogue. They become the genesis for ISIS or ISIL.
The Embassy in Benghazi falls and our Ambassador who was managing the arms deal for Clinton is killed. The State dept / CIA annex is destroyed.

New York Senator Hillary Clinton (L) lis

Now not only are Obama and Clinton implicated, so are top Republicans such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham. Everyone who approved of arming and creating ISIS is at risk.

Enter Donald Trump.
A Republican outsider who does not play by the rules. He rides a wave of revolution in the US.
Obama, Clinton and top Republicans know that their “secret” could be exposed.

Now they are panicking. If this is exposed they all could go to jail and risk their cozy jobs and pensions. (Remember Iran Contra)

So they all turn on Donald Trump, but they are also scared as they see the people from both parties revolting. They know that Trump would investigate and expose their treasonous activities. Trump does have a chance to win the election…

All because Clinton decided she wanted to change the Middle East…