Lawmakers ‘suspicious’ administration ‘trying to hide’ Libya attack details | Fox News
Question to ponder, Was CLinton or her aide Huma compromised? Did the State Dept leak information on our agents “Safe House” in Benghazi that got the ambassador killed? Why were all the people from Langley pulled out of country so fast? Either:
A: They had all been compromised or B: The Obama administration did not want them conducting the investigation into the ambassadors death as they might find out that the State Dept or WH compromised the mission they were on.
It makes no sense to send the FBI there (They still are not feet on ground) when they had qualifed agents in country.
Fresh claims that U.S. intelligence officials knew practically from the start that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was terrorism possibly tied to Al Qaeda have lawmakers alleging they were misled and questioning whether the administration has something to hide.
“This is turning into something not short of Benghazi-gate,” Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., told Fox News, adding he’s “very suspicious” about the way the administration has handled this.
Two senior U.S. officials told Fox News on Thursday that U.S. intelligence officials knew within 24 hours of the assault that it was a terrorist attack and suspected Al Qaeda-tied elements were involved.
The account sharply conflicted with claims by U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice on the Sunday after the attack that the administration believed the strike was a “spontaneous” event triggered by protests in Egypt over an anti-Islam film.
“The best information and the best assessment we have today is that in fact this was not a preplanned, premeditated attack — that what happened initially was it was a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired in Cairo as a consequence of the video,” Rice said on “Fox News Sunday” at the time.
via Lawmakers ‘suspicious’ administration ‘trying to hide’ Libya attack details | Fox News.
